The State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Shankar Waghmare Advocate - Gundre Bharat M — 612/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,447,294,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA090021102018

Filing Number

2110/2018

Filing Date

30-Aug-2018

Registration No

612/2018

Registration Date

30-Aug-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

176

Police Station

Police Station Jalkot

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,447,294,323,504,506
Bombay Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Parkote Jawed E

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Shankar Waghmare Advocate - Gundre Bharat M

  2. 2.Tanaji Shankar Waghmare

  3. 3.Kondiba Haibati Waghmare

  4. 4.Sanjay Kondiba Waghmare

  5. 5.manoj Kondiba Waghmare

  6. 6.Rajkumar Gunaji Waghmare

  7. 7.Umakant Gunaji Waghmare

  8. 8.Arjun Umakant Waghmare

  9. 9.Karan Umakant Waghmare

  10. 10.Akshay Umakant Waghmare

  11. 11.Janardhan Sopan Waghmare

  12. 12.Vishal Janardhan Waghmare

  13. 13.Subhash Hanmant Waghmare

  14. 14.Digambar Hanmant Waghmare

  15. 15.Mohan Mahepati Waghmare

  16. 16.Sharad Mohan waghmare

  17. 17.Ram Mahapati Waghmare

  18. 18.Madhav Babarao Waghmare

  19. 19.Nitin Madhav Waghmare

  20. 20.Vaijanath Vitthal Waghmare

  21. 21.Subodh Vaijanath Waghmare

  22. 22.Kondiba Khandu Waghmare

  23. 23.Rajkumar Tanaji Waghmare

  24. 24.Premkumar Tanaji Waghmare

  25. 25.Anil Gunaji Waghmare

  26. 26.Gangadhar Khandu Waghmare

  27. 27.Amol Gangadhar Waghmare

  28. 28.Ashish Raosaheb Waghmare

  29. 29.Adarsh Raosaheb Waghmare

  30. 30.pavan Kishan Waghmare

  31. 31.Rohit Tukaram Waghmare

  32. 32.Rashtrapal Dhondiba Waghmare

  33. 33.Madhav Venkati Waghmare

  34. 34.Venkat Jaywant Waghmare

  35. 35.Santosh Bhiva Waghmare

  36. 36.Ravindra Waman Waghmare

  37. 37.Sandipkumar Tanaji Waghmare

  38. 38.Angad Bhanudas Waghmare

  39. 39.Vitthal Bhuja Waghmare

  40. 40.Goutam Vitthal Waghmare

  41. 41.Pramod Goutam Sonkamble

  42. 42.Dhondiba Narayan Sonkamble

  43. 43.Ramdas Dhondiba Sonkamble

  44. 44.Arvind Dhondiba Sonkamble

  45. 45.pandurang Venkat Sonkamble

  46. 46.Venkat Santram Sonkamble

  47. 47.Kamlakar Ramesh Sonkamble

  48. 48.Ratnadeep Motiram Kamble

  49. 49.Dipak Motiram Waghmare

  50. 50.Sujit Ramchandra Bodke

  51. 51.Vaijanath Shankar Gavle

  52. 52.Atul Vaijanath Gavle

  53. 53.Tathagat Vaijanath Gavle

  54. 54.Milind Pandhari Suryawanshi

  55. 55.Sunil Pradip Govind Waghmare

  56. 56.Jivan Vitthal Sonkamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 612/2018 Court's Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Udgir acquitted all 54 accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 294, 447, 452, 504, 506 read with section 149, and Maharashtra Police Act section 135. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully assembled, committed rioting, criminal intimidation, house trespass, and public nuisance at the complainant's residence on 30 January 2017. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence from the sole prosecution witness (a police officer) to substantiate the allegations. The complainant's testimony was largely hearsay regarding the circumstances of the alleged incident, and the prosecution's witness could not provide direct or convincing proof of the accused's participation in any criminal conspiracy or unlawful gathering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Compromise

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Compromise

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    PleaView PDF

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Compromise

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Compromise

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  18. 23-Jul-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Nayadhikari, Gram Nayalaya Jalkot

  19. 23-Apr-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Nayadhikari, Gram Nayalaya Jalkot

  20. 29-Jan-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Nayadhikari, Gram Nayalaya Jalkot

  21. 15-Jan-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Nayadhikari, Gram Nayalaya Jalkot

  22. 06-Nov-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Nayadhikari, Gram Nayalaya Jalkot

  23. 04-Sep-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Nayadhikari, Gram Nayalaya Jalkot

  24. 03-Jun-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Nayadhikari, Gram Nayalaya Jalkot

  25. 03-Apr-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  26. 15-Feb-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  27. 24-Nov-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  28. 02-Sep-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  29. 19-May-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  30. 04-Feb-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  31. 20-Dec-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  32. 10-Oct-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  33. 18-Aug-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  34. 02-Aug-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  35. 02-Jun-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

  36. 22-Apr-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  37. 22-Mar-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  38. 22-Feb-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  39. 19-Jan-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  40. 29-Dec-2021

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  41. 26-Mar-2021

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  42. 17-Feb-2021

    Filing of Surety

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  43. 02-Dec-2020

    Filing of Surety

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  44. 29-Sep-2020

    Filing of Surety

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  45. 15-Jul-2020

    Filing of Surety

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  46. 16-May-2020

    Filing of Surety

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  47. 21-Mar-2020

    Filing of Surety

    3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir

  48. 07-Dec-2019

    Filing of Surety

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  49. 11-Oct-2019

    Filing of Surety

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  50. 25-Jul-2019

    Filing of Surety

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  51. 10-May-2019

    Appearance

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  52. 28-Feb-2019

    Appearance

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  53. 29-Jan-2019

    Appearance

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  54. 13-Nov-2018

    Appearance

    1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  55. 31-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 30-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 612/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 612/2018 Court's Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Udgir acquitted all 54 accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 294, 447, 452, 504, 506 read with section 149, and Maharashtra Police Act section 135. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully assembled, committed rioting, criminal intimidation, house trespass, and public nuisance at the complainant's residence on 30 January 2017. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence from the sole prosecution witness (a police officer) to substantiate the allegations. The complainant's testimony was largely hearsay regarding the circumstances of the alleged incident, and the prosecution's witness could not provide direct or convincing proof of the accused's participation in any criminal conspiracy or unlawful gathering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case