The State of Maharashtra vs Samad Shamshoddin Jagirdar — 794/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12-A. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA090021002025

Appearance

Next Hearing

10th August 2026

Filing Number

1329/2025

Filing Date

10-06-2025

Registration No

794/2025

Registration Date

10-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir

Judge

3-3rd Jt. CJJD JMFC Udgir

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

Police Station Wadhona

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12-A

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Samad Shamshoddin Jagirdar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3rd Jt. CJJD JMFC Udgir

13-03-2026

Appearance

23-02-2026

Appearance

28-10-2025

Appearance

28-08-2025

Appearance

20-08-2025

Order

Interim Orders

28-08-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 794/2025 The State of Maharashtra v. Samad Shamshoddin Jagirdar The court allowed the accused's application for interim custody of a seized mobile handset (valued at Rs.15,000) under Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, who purchased the device in December 2023, was granted temporary possession upon executing a supurdanama bond and indemnity bond of Rs.15,000 each, with conditions that he produce it as required and ensure its availability during trial related to the gambling offense investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 794/2025 The State of Maharashtra v. Samad Shamshoddin Jagirdar The court allowed the accused's application for interim custody of a seized mobile handset (valued at Rs.15,000) under Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, who purchased the device in December 2023, was granted temporary possession upon executing a supurdanama bond and indemnity bond of Rs.15,000 each, with conditions that he produce it as required and ensure its availability during trial related to the gambling offense investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case