Rihana @ Halima W/o Ramjan Sayyad vs Ramjan S/o Rashidsab Sayyad Advocate - Hulle Sanjay S — 658/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA090018942023
Filing Number
1016/2023
Filing Date
26-Apr-2023
Registration No
658/2023
Registration Date
26-Apr-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rihana @ Halima W/o Ramjan Sayyad
Adv. Shaikh Habib R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramjan S/o Rashidsab Sayyad Advocate - Hulle Sanjay S
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
10-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
14-Aug-2024
Dismissal Order
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
23-Jul-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
25-Jun-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
23-Apr-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
20-Mar-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
07-Feb-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
17-Jan-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
21-Dec-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
07-Dec-2023
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: 658/2023 Case: Rihana @ Halima v. Ramjan S/o Rashidsab Sayyad Court: Civil Court, Udgir (Maharashtra) Date: 07/12/2023 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED Key Facts: Petitioner sought an interim injunction to prevent respondent (her estranged husband) from selling agricultural land (Survey No. 140, measuring 1 hectare 72 acres). Petitioner claimed the property was gifted to her orally in 2017 by respondent in the presence of witnesses, and she has been in possession since then. Court's Finding: The court found that petitioner failed to establish prima facie case. While respondent's name appeared on government records, petitioner produced no documentary evidence supporting her alleged oral gift or current possession. The court held petitioner had not proven irreparable harm would result from denial of interim relief. Order: The petition for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, CPC was dismissed due to lack of prima facie case and failure to establish balance of convenience in petitioner's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Dec-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
22-Nov-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
02-Nov-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
16-Oct-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
30-Aug-2023
W.S. and Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
28-Jul-2023
W.S. and Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
26-Jun-2023
Ex-Parte Order
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
04-May-2023
Appearance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
27-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 658/2023
Case Summary: 658/2023 Case: Rihana @ Halima v. Ramjan S/o Rashidsab Sayyad Court: Civil Court, Udgir (Maharashtra) Date: 07/12/2023 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED Key Facts: Petitioner sought an interim injunction to prevent respondent (her estranged husband) from selling agricultural land (Survey No. 140, measuring 1 hectare 72 acres). Petitioner claimed the property was gifted to her orally in 2017 by respondent in the presence of witnesses, and she has been in possession since then. Court's Finding: The court found that petitioner failed to establish prima facie case. While respondent's name appeared on government records, petitioner produced no documentary evidence supporting her alleged oral gift or current possession. The court held petitioner had not proven irreparable harm would result from denial of interim relief. Order: The petition for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, CPC was dismissed due to lack of prima facie case and failure to establish balance of convenience in petitioner's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts