Shesherao Govindrao Gurdhalkar vs Bhausaheb Annarao Kendre and other 1 Advocate - Patil Balaji V — 331/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA090017242020
Filing Number
607/2020
Filing Date
27-Jul-2020
Registration No
331/2020
Registration Date
27-Jul-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shesherao Govindrao Gurdhalkar
Adv. Bhalke Basweshwar N
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhausaheb Annarao Kendre and other 1 Advocate - Patil Balaji V
-
2.Annarao Narayan Kendre
Adv. Patil Balaji V
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
10-Jan-2026
Evidence
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
18-Nov-2025
Compliance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
28-Oct-2025
Compliance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
24-Sep-2025
Compliance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
26-Aug-2025
List of Witness
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
28-Jul-2025
List of Witness
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
30-Jun-2025
List of Witness
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
16-Jun-2025
Issues
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
20-Mar-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: RCS 331/2020 Outcome: The temporary injunction application was rejected. The court found that petitioner Shesherao failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not produce sufficient documentary evidence or witnesses to prove possession of the disputed open space (280 sq. ft.) or that defendants were conducting illegal construction. Without establishing these essential elements, the court determined there was no risk of irreparable loss and balance of convenience did not favor the petitioner. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2025
Issues
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
13-Mar-2025
Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
21-Feb-2025
Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
06-Feb-2025
Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
18-Jan-2025
Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
02-Jan-2025
Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
06-Dec-2024
Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
12-Nov-2024
Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
24-Sep-2024
Steps
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
23-Aug-2024
Steps
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
15-Jul-2024
Dismissal Order
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
18-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
24-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
05-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
06-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
22-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
12-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
08-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
18-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
13-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
28-Aug-2023
Depositing Amount
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
21-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
11-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
21-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
21-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
10-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
15-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
07-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
11-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
12-Oct-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
08-Sep-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
25-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
25-Jul-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
11-Jul-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
12-Apr-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
19-Mar-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
03-Mar-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
18-Jan-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
26-Nov-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
26-Oct-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
24-Aug-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
25-Jun-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
28-Apr-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
15-Feb-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
15-Dec-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
17-Oct-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
19-Sep-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
09-Sep-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
03-Sep-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
21-Aug-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
17-Aug-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
13-Aug-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
07-Aug-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
03-Aug-2020
W.S. and Say
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
28-Jul-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jul-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 331/2020
Case Summary: RCS 331/2020 Outcome: The temporary injunction application was rejected. The court found that petitioner Shesherao failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not produce sufficient documentary evidence or witnesses to prove possession of the disputed open space (280 sq. ft.) or that defendants were conducting illegal construction. Without establishing these essential elements, the court determined there was no risk of irreparable loss and balance of convenience did not favor the petitioner. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts