Shayana Wajid Shaikh vs Munshi Sami Ullah Mohammad Yusuf — 112/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7RULE1AND2. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 22nd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA090007682026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
380/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shayana Wajid Shaikh
Adv. HASHMI AKHIL HAJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Munshi Sami Ullah Mohammad Yusuf
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Civil Court at Udgir disposed of Case 112/2026 between Shayana Wajid Shaikh (petitioner) and Munshi Sami Ullah Mohammad Yusuf (respondent) by approving a settlement agreement (Sudh Tadjood Patra) filed by both parties on 22 April 2026. The court decreed the case in accordance with the settlement terms, issued a decree accordingly, and directed the plaintiff to pay court fees as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
16-Apr-2026
Compromise
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
15-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Compliance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
14-Mar-2026
Appearance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
The Civil Court at Udgir disposed of Case 112/2026 between Shayana Wajid Shaikh (petitioner) and Munshi Sami Ullah Mohammad Yusuf (respondent) by approving a settlement agreement (Sudh Tadjood Patra) filed by both parties on 22 April 2026. The court decreed the case in accordance with the settlement terms, issued a decree accordingly, and directed the plaintiff to pay court fees as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts