Rajkumar Purushottam Karanjikar Kulkarni vs Nil — 260/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Sec.8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 29th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA090007492026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
370/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
260/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajkumar Purushottam Karanjikar Kulkarni
Adv. MAHAJAN UPENDRA CHANDRAKANTRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 260/2026 The court granted Rajkumar Purushottam Karanjikar Kulkarni's petition for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, Section 8. The petitioner's father, Purushottam Vamanarav Kulkarni (age 72), died on 30/12/2025 in Udgir. The court found that four direct heirs qualified for succession: the widow (age 71), two sons (ages 47 and 45), and one daughter (age 50), and declared them as legal successors entitled to the certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
28-Apr-2026
Arguments
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 260/2026
Summary of Case 260/2026 The court granted Rajkumar Purushottam Karanjikar Kulkarni's petition for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, Section 8. The petitioner's father, Purushottam Vamanarav Kulkarni (age 72), died on 30/12/2025 in Udgir. The court found that four direct heirs qualified for succession: the widow (age 71), two sons (ages 47 and 45), and one daughter (age 50), and declared them as legal successors entitled to the certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts