The State of Maharashtra vs Shaikh Vajir Najirsab — 195/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA090005102025
Filing Number
403/2025
Filing Date
03-Feb-2025
Registration No
195/2025
Registration Date
03-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaikh Vajir Najirsab
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State vs. Shaikh Vajir Nazir (S.C.C. 195/2025) The Judicial Magistrate at Udgir stopped criminal proceedings against Shaikh Vajir Nazir under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, for alleged liquor prohibition violations under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case as the Complaint Agent's report remained unfiled, and ordered seized liquor to be disposed of by the District Collector (Excise), Latur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
10-Jan-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
03-Jan-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
15-Oct-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
22-Jul-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
15-May-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
06-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 195/2025
Case Summary: State vs. Shaikh Vajir Nazir (S.C.C. 195/2025) The Judicial Magistrate at Udgir stopped criminal proceedings against Shaikh Vajir Nazir under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, for alleged liquor prohibition violations under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case as the Complaint Agent's report remained unfiled, and ordered seized liquor to be disposed of by the District Collector (Excise), Latur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts