State of Maharashtra vs Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Advocate - Mashalkar Mahesh M — 28/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHLA070004902023

Case disposed

Filing Number

306/2023

Filing Date

04-08-2023

Registration No

28/2023

Registration Date

04-08-2023

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

101

Police Station

Police Station Wadhona

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,506

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. S.I.Birajdar

Respondent(s)

Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Advocate - Mashalkar Mahesh M

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Judgment

10-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Arguments

20-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Decision: The court acquitted defendant Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, and 506 on March 13, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove he assaulted a government employee. The complainant and eyewitness testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and the court emphasized that direct witness evidence cannot be displaced by circumstantial evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Decision: The court acquitted defendant Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, and 506 on March 13, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove he assaulted a government employee. The complainant and eyewitness testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and the court emphasized that direct witness evidence cannot be displaced by circumstantial evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case