State of Maharashtra vs Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Advocate - Mashalkar Mahesh M — 28/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHLA070004902023

Filing Number

306/2023

Filing Date

04-Aug-2023

Registration No

28/2023

Registration Date

04-Aug-2023

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

101

Police Station

Police Station Wadhona

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. S.I.Birajdar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Advocate - Mashalkar Mahesh M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Decision: The court acquitted defendant Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, and 506 on March 13, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove he assaulted a government employee. The complainant and eyewitness testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and the court emphasized that direct witness evidence cannot be displaced by circumstantial evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  12. 01-Oct-2025

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Charge

    Ad-hoc District Judge - 1, Udgir

  14. 02-Jun-2025

    Charge

    Ad-hoc District Judge - 1, Udgir

  15. 31-Jan-2025

    Charge

    Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir

  16. 09-Jan-2025

    Charge

    Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir

  17. 15-Nov-2024

    Charge

    Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir

  18. 20-Sep-2024

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  19. 12-Jul-2024

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  20. 30-Apr-2024

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  21. 20-Mar-2024

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  22. 06-Feb-2024

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  23. 10-Nov-2023

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  24. 27-Sep-2023

    First Order

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  25. 07-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 04-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Decision: The court acquitted defendant Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, and 506 on March 13, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove he assaulted a government employee. The complainant and eyewitness testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and the court emphasized that direct witness evidence cannot be displaced by circumstantial evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case