State of Maharashtra vs Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Advocate - Mashalkar Mahesh M — 28/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHLA070004902023
Filing Number
306/2023
Filing Date
04-08-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
04-08-2023
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
101
Police Station
Police Station Wadhona
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. S.I.Birajdar
Respondent(s)
Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Advocate - Mashalkar Mahesh M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Decision: The court acquitted defendant Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, and 506 on March 13, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove he assaulted a government employee. The complainant and eyewitness testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and the court emphasized that direct witness evidence cannot be displaced by circumstantial evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar Decision: The court acquitted defendant Pundlik Vishwanath Biradar of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, and 506 on March 13, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove he assaulted a government employee. The complainant and eyewitness testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and the court emphasized that direct witness evidence cannot be displaced by circumstantial evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts