Shivshankar Shriram Gagre (telange) vs Wajid Janimiya Shaikh — 12/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 152,153. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th March 2026.
MACP. M.A. - Misc. Application in Motor Accident Claims
CNR: MHLA070004042024
e-Filing Number
11-07-2024
Filing Number
162/2024
Filing Date
12-07-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
12-07-2024
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivshankar Shriram Gagre (telange)
Adv. JAGALPURE BALAJI GANGADHAR
Respondent(s)
Wajid Janimiya Shaikh
Icici Lumbard General Insurance Company Ltd By Branch Officer, 414, Icicsi Lumbard House, Veer Sa
Adv. S.N. Gurav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
Disposed
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 13-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 27-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: MACP No. 12/2024 The court granted the applicant's petition to correct his name from "Sumit Sriram Gajare" to "Shivshankar Sriram Gajare" in the original motor accident compensation petition. The court found that the applicant's Aadhaar card and photograph confirmed he was the same person, and his name had been mistakenly recorded as a pet name in the petition, preventing him from withdrawing his share of the Rs. 14,60,000 settlement amount approved in Lok-adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MACP No. 12/2024 The court granted the applicant's petition to correct his name from "Sumit Sriram Gajare" to "Shivshankar Sriram Gajare" in the original motor accident compensation petition. The court found that the applicant's Aadhaar card and photograph confirmed he was the same person, and his name had been mistakenly recorded as a pet name in the petition, preventing him from withdrawing his share of the Rs. 14,60,000 settlement amount approved in Lok-adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts