State of Maharashtra vs Gangaram Haku Chavan ( 2 UTP) Advocate - S.G.Gundre — 29/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),20(B),2(C). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHLA070003902025

Filing Number

224/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

29/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

174

Police Station

Police Station Deoni

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),20(B),2(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. G.C.Sayyed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gangaram Haku Chavan ( 2 UTP) Advocate - S.G.Gundre

  2. 2.Santosh Gangaram Chavan

    Adv. R.A.Patil

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  3. 20-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  4. 06-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gangaram Haku Chavan & Santosh Gangaram Chavan (Case No. 29/2025) Outcome: Bail application rejected by Special Judge D.B. Mhalatkar on 12.03.2026. Key Facts: Santosh Gangaram Chavan sought regular bail in an NDPS case involving cannabis cultivation on commercial quantity. He argued he had no connection to the disputed land and was falsely implicated. The prosecution opposed, citing serious charges and witness tampering risks under Sections 2, 8, and 20-B NDPS Act. Reasoning: The court found he was caught red-handed cultivating cannabis plants, with statutory presumption of guilt under Section 54 NDPS Act. With most witnesses examined and trial nearing completion, the court found insufficient grounds to believe he was innocent or wouldn't reoffend on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  14. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  16. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  17. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  18. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  19. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  20. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  21. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  22. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  23. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  24. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  25. 25-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  26. 22-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  27. 22-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  28. 09-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  29. 04-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

  30. 26-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge - 1, Udgir

  31. 20-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge - 1, Udgir

  32. 06-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Ad-hoc District Judge - 1, Udgir

  33. 23-Jul-2025

    Production of Accused

    Ad-hoc District Judge - 1, Udgir

  34. 10-Jul-2025

    Production of Accused

    Ad-hoc District Judge - 1, Udgir

  35. 26-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 25-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gangaram Haku Chavan & Santosh Gangaram Chavan (Case No. 29/2025) Outcome: Bail application rejected by Special Judge D.B. Mhalatkar on 12.03.2026. Key Facts: Santosh Gangaram Chavan sought regular bail in an NDPS case involving cannabis cultivation on commercial quantity. He argued he had no connection to the disputed land and was falsely implicated. The prosecution opposed, citing serious charges and witness tampering risks under Sections 2, 8, and 20-B NDPS Act. Reasoning: The court found he was caught red-handed cultivating cannabis plants, with statutory presumption of guilt under Section 54 NDPS Act. With most witnesses examined and trial nearing completion, the court found insufficient grounds to believe he was innocent or wouldn't reoffend on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case