State of Maharashtra vs Gangaram Haku Chavan ( 2 UTP) Advocate - S.G.Gundre — 29/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),20(B),2(C). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHLA070003902025
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
224/2025
Filing Date
25-06-2025
Registration No
29/2025
Registration Date
25-06-2025
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
FIR Details
FIR Number
174
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. G.C.Sayyed
Respondent(s)
Gangaram Haku Chavan ( 2 UTP) Advocate - S.G.Gundre
Santosh Gangaram Chavan
Adv. R.A.Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gangaram Haku Chavan & Santosh Gangaram Chavan (Case No. 29/2025) Outcome: Bail application rejected by Special Judge D.B. Mhalatkar on 12.03.2026. Key Facts: Santosh Gangaram Chavan sought regular bail in an NDPS case involving cannabis cultivation on commercial quantity. He argued he had no connection to the disputed land and was falsely implicated. The prosecution opposed, citing serious charges and witness tampering risks under Sections 2, 8, and 20-B NDPS Act. Reasoning: The court found he was caught red-handed cultivating cannabis plants, with statutory presumption of guilt under Section 54 NDPS Act. With most witnesses examined and trial nearing completion, the court found insufficient grounds to believe he was innocent or wouldn't reoffend on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gangaram Haku Chavan & Santosh Gangaram Chavan (Case No. 29/2025) Outcome: Bail application rejected by Special Judge D.B. Mhalatkar on 12.03.2026. Key Facts: Santosh Gangaram Chavan sought regular bail in an NDPS case involving cannabis cultivation on commercial quantity. He argued he had no connection to the disputed land and was falsely implicated. The prosecution opposed, citing serious charges and witness tampering risks under Sections 2, 8, and 20-B NDPS Act. Reasoning: The court found he was caught red-handed cultivating cannabis plants, with statutory presumption of guilt under Section 54 NDPS Act. With most witnesses examined and trial nearing completion, the court found insufficient grounds to believe he was innocent or wouldn't reoffend on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts