Bilal Khaled Qureshi vs State of Maharashtra — 32/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 04th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHLA070001142026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
73/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bilal Khaled Qureshi
Adv. Patel Nazim N
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir
Disposed
Order on Exh
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Bilal Khaled Qureshi v. State of Maharashtra (32/2026) The court granted bail to 25-year-old driver Bilal Khaled Qureshi, accused of child sexual exploitation under POCSO Act and BNS sections, after he spent over a month in judicial custody. The judge found prima facie evidence suggested a consensual relationship rather than criminal conduct, and Qureshi's role was limited to providing transportation, warranting conditional bail with a Rs. 1,00,000 bond and restrictions including a territorial bar from entering the victim's tahsil. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Bilal Khaled Qureshi v. State of Maharashtra (32/2026) The court granted bail to 25-year-old driver Bilal Khaled Qureshi, accused of child sexual exploitation under POCSO Act and BNS sections, after he spent over a month in judicial custody. The judge found prima facie evidence suggested a consensual relationship rather than criminal conduct, and Qureshi's role was limited to providing transportation, warranting conditional bail with a Rs. 1,00,000 bond and restrictions including a territorial bar from entering the victim's tahsil. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts