Sitaram S/o Shyamrao Gangakhedkar vs Balu alise Balappa S/o Rudrappa Kasnale — 796/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA060037222025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-12-2025
Filing Number
1605/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
796/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sitaram S/o Shyamrao Gangakhedkar
Adv. Nikam Angad K
Respondent(s)
Balu alise Balappa S/o Rudrappa Kasnale
Madhav S/o Balappa Kasnale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Written Statement
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Written Statement |
| 24-04-2026 | Order |
| 13-04-2026 | Order |
| 02-04-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 796/2025 The court rejected the compromise pursis filed by Sitaram and defendants Balu and Madhav regarding disputed land at Gat No. 325. Since the defendants' title was already established through registered sale deeds executed by the plaintiff's mother (not challenged) and revenue records, the court found that the principal relief sought—declaration of ownership—was not legally maintainable. The suit shall proceed for adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 796/2025 The court rejected the compromise pursis filed by Sitaram and defendants Balu and Madhav regarding disputed land at Gat No. 325. Since the defendants' title was already established through registered sale deeds executed by the plaintiff's mother (not challenged) and revenue records, the court found that the principal relief sought—declaration of ownership—was not legally maintainable. The suit shall proceed for adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts