Devidas S/o Narayan Yechale vs Sangita W/o Virbhadra Bhure and other 1 Advocate - Patil Suhas G — 722/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA060034532025

e-Filing Number

12-11-2025

Filing Number

1479/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

722/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Devidas S/o Narayan Yechale

    Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sangita W/o Virbhadra Bhure and other 1 Advocate - Patil Suhas G

  2. 2.Virbhadra S/o Gurunath Bhure

    Adv. Patil Suhas G

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  5. 14-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  7. 01-Jan-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 722/2025 Court: Additional Civil Court, Ahmednagar Parties: Devidas S/o Narayan Yechale (Petitioner) vs. Sangita W/o Virbhadra Bhure and Virbhadra S/o Gurunath Bhure (Respondents) Order Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request for a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from obstructing the petitioner's use of a right-of-way (public road/path) on the southern side of the petitioner's properties. The court found that while the petitioner failed to conclusively prove the public nature of the road, the respondents could not justify their construction activities blocking the petitioner's access and use rights. Key Issue: Dispute over a 7-foot-wide road/path adjacent to the petitioner's agricultural plots, which the respondents were attempting to block through construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 01-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  12. 12-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  14. 01-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  15. 18-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  16. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 722/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 722/2025 Court: Additional Civil Court, Ahmednagar Parties: Devidas S/o Narayan Yechale (Petitioner) vs. Sangita W/o Virbhadra Bhure and Virbhadra S/o Gurunath Bhure (Respondents) Order Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request for a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from obstructing the petitioner's use of a right-of-way (public road/path) on the southern side of the petitioner's properties. The court found that while the petitioner failed to conclusively prove the public nature of the road, the respondents could not justify their construction activities blocking the petitioner's access and use rights. Key Issue: Dispute over a 7-foot-wide road/path adjacent to the petitioner's agricultural plots, which the respondents were attempting to block through construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case