State of Maharashtra vs Shrinivas S/o. Madhav Patil and Ors. — 451/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326, 325,323,504,506,143,147,149. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA060032762023
Next Hearing
18th July 2026
Filing Number
1167/2023
Filing Date
16-12-2023
Registration No
451/2023
Registration Date
16-12-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
FIR Details
FIR Number
266
Police Station
Kingaon Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Kakde Ashwini N
Respondent(s)
Shrinivas S/o. Madhav Patil and Ors.
Keshav S/o. Bhivaji Patil
Kishor S/o.Keshav Patil
Madhav S/o.Bhivaji Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 12-01-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 451/2023 State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o. Madhav Patil and Ors. The court examined a witness testimony regarding crime scene inspection procedures. The witness claimed police did not conduct the inspection in their presence and that they signed a document without understanding its contents. The court allowed examination of cross-examination questions under CrPC Section 154. The defendants' cross-examination request was rejected, and no further examination was permitted. The matter was concluded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 451/2023 State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o. Madhav Patil and Ors. The court examined a witness testimony regarding crime scene inspection procedures. The witness claimed police did not conduct the inspection in their presence and that they signed a document without understanding its contents. The court allowed examination of cross-examination questions under CrPC Section 154. The defendants' cross-examination request was rejected, and no further examination was permitted. The matter was concluded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts