Yunus Najir ahmad Tamboli vs Mahebub pasha ismailsab tamboli Advocate - Sonkamble Vijay A — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA060028612025
e-Filing Number
09-09-2025
Filing Number
1198/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
11-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yunus Najir ahmad Tamboli
Adv. Sonkamble Asit Vijay
Respondent(s)
Mahebub pasha ismailsab tamboli Advocate - Sonkamble Vijay A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 26-02-2026 | Order |
| 10-02-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: M.A.N.R.J.I. No.03 of 2025 (Yunus Najir Ahmad Tamboli v. Mehebub Pasha Ismailsab Tamboli) The court partly allowed the application to correct the compromise decree in RCS No.1110/2022 (dated 20.06.2023). The petitioner sought to amend the property's east-west measurement from 45 feet to 40 feet (a typographical error confirmed by municipal records) and change the eastern boundary description from another property to a road. The court approved the measurement correction under Sections 152-153 of the CPC, with respondent's consent and municipal documentation supporting the amendment. However, the boundary amendment was rejected due to lack of evidence and risk of prejudicing unknown third parties. The decree and duplicate plaint were ordered amended only for the measurement correction, with fresh copies to be filed and issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.A.N.R.J.I. No.03 of 2025 (Yunus Najir Ahmad Tamboli v. Mehebub Pasha Ismailsab Tamboli) The court partly allowed the application to correct the compromise decree in RCS No.1110/2022 (dated 20.06.2023). The petitioner sought to amend the property's east-west measurement from 45 feet to 40 feet (a typographical error confirmed by municipal records) and change the eastern boundary description from another property to a road. The court approved the measurement correction under Sections 152-153 of the CPC, with respondent's consent and municipal documentation supporting the amendment. However, the boundary amendment was rejected due to lack of evidence and risk of prejudicing unknown third parties. The decree and duplicate plaint were ordered amended only for the measurement correction, with fresh copies to be filed and issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts