Ramchandra Narayan Kachave vs Sanjay Narayan Kachave and oth 1 Advocate - Phad Sangram B — 498/2023

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHLA060026182023

Filing Number

1693/2023

Filing Date

13-Sep-2023

Registration No

498/2023

Registration Date

13-Sep-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramchandra Narayan Kachave

    Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Narayan Kachave and oth 1 Advocate - Phad Sangram B

  2. 2.Narayan Tulshiram Kachave

  3. 3.Rukminbai Govind Bais

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 498 of 2023 The court rejected Ramchandra Narayan Kachave's application seeking condonation of delay to restore Civil M.A. No. 269/2017, which had been dismissed in default in 2022. The applicant, himself a practicing advocate, had failed to appear on any court date in the original application filed to set aside an ex-parte decree, attributing his default to alleged non-communication by his counsel. The court found his explanation unreasonable and held that since the applicant was legally trained, he bore heightened responsibility for monitoring his case. The court noted the applicant's negligence was "multi-folded"—first failing to contest the underlying suit, then failing to pursue the restoration application—and rejected his plea as devoid of merit, finding that granting relief would further prejudice the respondents who had been unable to enjoy the fruits of the 2017 decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Order

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  9. 29-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  11. 29-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  12. 04-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  13. 15-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  15. 29-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  16. 23-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  17. 02-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  19. 11-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  20. 03-May-2025

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  21. 15-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  22. 05-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  23. 29-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  24. 21-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  25. 10-Mar-2025

    Defence Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  26. 15-Feb-2025

    Defence Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  27. 15-Jan-2025

    Defence Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  28. 17-Dec-2024

    Defence Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  29. 26-Nov-2024

    Defence Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  30. 19-Oct-2024

    Defence Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  31. 05-Oct-2024

    Defence Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  32. 17-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  33. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  34. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  35. 20-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  36. 30-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  37. 12-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  38. 22-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  39. 07-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  40. 23-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  41. 02-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  42. 02-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  43. 02-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  44. 11-Oct-2023

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur

  45. 15-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 13-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 498/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 498 of 2023 The court rejected Ramchandra Narayan Kachave's application seeking condonation of delay to restore Civil M.A. No. 269/2017, which had been dismissed in default in 2022. The applicant, himself a practicing advocate, had failed to appear on any court date in the original application filed to set aside an ex-parte decree, attributing his default to alleged non-communication by his counsel. The court found his explanation unreasonable and held that since the applicant was legally trained, he bore heightened responsibility for monitoring his case. The court noted the applicant's negligence was "multi-folded"—first failing to contest the underlying suit, then failing to pursue the restoration application—and rejected his plea as devoid of merit, finding that granting relief would further prejudice the respondents who had been unable to enjoy the fruits of the 2017 decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case