geeta sanjaykumar kadam vs sanjaykumar shivraj kadam — 772/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA060022542024

Evidence

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

01-09-2024

Filing Number

1291/2024

Filing Date

10-09-2024

Registration No

772/2024

Registration Date

10-09-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 7

Petitioner(s)

geeta sanjaykumar kadam

Adv. Uppe Viresh M_LAPA

anushka sanjaykumar kadam ug of her real mother

Adv. Uppe Viresh M_LAPA55

Respondent(s)

sanjaykumar shivraj kadam

hanmant shivraj kadam

ankita hanmant kadam

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur

30-04-2026

Evidence

20-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 772/2024 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 30.01.2025 and accept their written statement on record. Although the defendants failed to file their written statement within the prescribed 90-day period under CPC Order VIII Rule 1 and filed the application with significant delay on 07.03.2025, the court found their affidavit-supported explanation credible. Given that the suit (seeking declaration that an adoption deed is null and void and that plaintiff No.2 is the biological daughter of plaintiff No.1 and defendant No.1) was at an initial stage, the court deemed it just to allow the defendants an opportunity to present their defense. However, to penalize the delay, the defendants were ordered to pay Rs.100 each as cost to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 772/2024 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 30.01.2025 and accept their written statement on record. Although the defendants failed to file their written statement within the prescribed 90-day period under CPC Order VIII Rule 1 and filed the application with significant delay on 07.03.2025, the court found their affidavit-supported explanation credible. Given that the suit (seeking declaration that an adoption deed is null and void and that plaintiff No.2 is the biological daughter of plaintiff No.1 and defendant No.1) was at an initial stage, the court deemed it just to allow the defendants an opportunity to present their defense. However, to penalize the delay, the defendants were ordered to pay Rs.100 each as cost to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case