State of Maharashtra vs Rameshwar S/o Datta Yesmod — 1500158/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA060020412025

Filing Number

1197/2025

Filing Date

12-Mar-2025

Registration No

1500158/2025

Registration Date

12-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rameshwar S/o Datta Yesmod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Rameshwar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case due to critical evidentiary gaps: the investigating officer failed to file a chemical analysis report and did not identify the receiver or carrier of the seized liquor (muddemal) as witnesses, breaking the chain of custody. Finding the case unprovable and unfit to continue, the court stopped proceedings under Section 281 BNSS, canceling bail bonds and directing disposal of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  4. 02-Jan-2026

    B.W._Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  5. 15-Oct-2025

    B.W._Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  6. 18-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1500158/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Rameshwar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case due to critical evidentiary gaps: the investigating officer failed to file a chemical analysis report and did not identify the receiver or carrier of the seized liquor (muddemal) as witnesses, breaking the chain of custody. Finding the case unprovable and unfit to continue, the court stopped proceedings under Section 281 BNSS, canceling bail bonds and directing disposal of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case