State of Maharashtra vs Nandkumar S/o Venkatrao Kamble — 1500576/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA060020122025

Filing Number

1169/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2024

Registration No

1500576/2024

Registration Date

20-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nandkumar S/o Venkatrao Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nandkumar (STC 576/2024) The court discharged accused Nandkumar under Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings for Maharashtra Prohibition Act violations. The investigation was fatally flawed: the chemical analysis report was missing, and the IO failed to identify the muddemal receiver and carrier as witnesses, breaking the chain of custody. The court found conviction impossible without this evidence and invoked Section 258 to reduce case pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  7. 03-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur

  8. 18-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1500576/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nandkumar (STC 576/2024) The court discharged accused Nandkumar under Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings for Maharashtra Prohibition Act violations. The investigation was fatally flawed: the chemical analysis report was missing, and the IO failed to identify the muddemal receiver and carrier as witnesses, breaking the chain of custody. The court found conviction impossible without this evidence and invoked Section 258 to reduce case pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case