State of Maharashtra vs Lakshman S/o Namdev Masule — 1500507/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA060019822025
Filing Number
1143/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2024
Registration No
1500507/2024
Registration Date
13-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lakshman S/o Namdev Masule
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Lakshman in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case by stopping proceedings under Section 281 BNSS due to critical evidentiary gaps: missing chemical analysis report and absence of witnesses documenting the chain of custody for seized contraband. The court found continuing the trial futile and exercised discretion to reduce case pendency, as the matter had remained pending over three years since 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
20-Dec-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
11-Nov-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
08-Oct-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
10-Sep-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
07-Aug-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
18-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1500507/2024
The court discharged accused Lakshman in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case by stopping proceedings under Section 281 BNSS due to critical evidentiary gaps: missing chemical analysis report and absence of witnesses documenting the chain of custody for seized contraband. The court found continuing the trial futile and exercised discretion to reduce case pendency, as the matter had remained pending over three years since 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts