State of Maharashtra vs Kabir Shyamsunder Pandurang Advocate - Murkute Baburao K — 75/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,427,323,504,506. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA060005722022
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
260/2022
Filing Date
23-02-2022
Registration No
75/2022
Registration Date
23-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
FIR Details
FIR Number
237
Police Station
Ahmdepur Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Kakde Ashwini N
Respondent(s)
Kabir Shyamsunder Pandurang Advocate - Murkute Baburao K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Hearing
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 75/2022 Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED Accused Kabir Shyamsundar Pandurang's application for discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. was rejected on 12 February 2024. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence against the accused based on witness statements corroborating allegations of criminal intimidation, assault, and property damage on 22/05/2021. While the accused contended a contradiction existed regarding the informant's mother's presence and claimed a financial dispute motivated false charges, the court determined these issues require full trial consideration and do not warrant discharge at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 75/2022 Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED Accused Kabir Shyamsundar Pandurang's application for discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. was rejected on 12 February 2024. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence against the accused based on witness statements corroborating allegations of criminal intimidation, assault, and property damage on 22/05/2021. While the accused contended a contradiction existed regarding the informant's mother's presence and claimed a financial dispute motivated false charges, the court determined these issues require full trial consideration and do not warrant discharge at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts