Ibrahim S/o Chandpasha Khureshi. vs Dinesh S/o Govindrao Ujalkar. — 108/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA060005062026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
246/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
108/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ibrahim S/o Chandpasha Khureshi.
Adv. Jadhav Bhagwat D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dinesh S/o Govindrao Ujalkar.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Lok Adalat at Ahmednagar passed an award based on a settlement compromise between Ibrahim S/o Chandpasha Khureshi (petitioner) and Dinesh S/o Govindrao Ujalkar (respondent). The award grants the petitioner certain land rights in Ahmednagar district measuring 30×50 feet with specific boundary specifications, and directs that any court fees paid be refunded. Both parties accepted the settlement terms, resolving their dispute through this mediated Lok Adalat proceeding under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 108/2026
The Lok Adalat at Ahmednagar passed an award based on a settlement compromise between Ibrahim S/o Chandpasha Khureshi (petitioner) and Dinesh S/o Govindrao Ujalkar (respondent). The award grants the petitioner certain land rights in Ahmednagar district measuring 30×50 feet with specific boundary specifications, and directs that any court fees paid be refunded. Both parties accepted the settlement terms, resolving their dispute through this mediated Lok Adalat proceeding under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts