Dhondiram S/o Manohar Gunale. vs The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur — 36/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA060004622026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
248/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhondiram S/o Manohar Gunale.
Adv. Musne Vijay B
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the petitioner Dhondiram's application for interim custody of a seized JCB 3DX excavator (Registration: MH-22-BC-5048) on conditional bail. The petitioner, who owns the machine, demonstrated ownership through registration documents and established that the equipment was essential for his daily livelihood, and that storing it in the police station risked deterioration. The court imposed conditions including a bond of ₹30 lakhs, prohibition on altering the vehicle's appearance or transferring it, photographic documentation by investigating officers, and appearance before the court as required, while the criminal case under BNS Sections 303(2), 3(5) and Environment Protection Act, 1986 proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the petitioner Dhondiram's application for interim custody of a seized JCB 3DX excavator (Registration: MH-22-BC-5048) on conditional bail. The petitioner, who owns the machine, demonstrated ownership through registration documents and established that the equipment was essential for his daily livelihood, and that storing it in the police station risked deterioration. The court imposed conditions including a bond of ₹30 lakhs, prohibition on altering the vehicle's appearance or transferring it, photographic documentation by investigating officers, and appearance before the court as required, while the criminal case under BNS Sections 303(2), 3(5) and Environment Protection Act, 1986 proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts