Ajay S/o Madhukar Gurude. vs The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur — 35/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA060004612026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
247/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajay S/o Madhukar Gurude.
Adv. Musne Vijay B
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 07-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 35/2026 Summary The court approved petitioner Ajay S/o Madhukar Gurude's application for interim custody of his Tata Tipper vehicle (Registration MH-24-AU-2079) seized in FIR 91/2026 under IPC Sections 303(2), 3(5), and Environment Protection Act Section 15, upon furnishing a bond of ₹30,00,000. The vehicle was allegedly used illegally for minor mineral transportation, but the petitioner proved ownership through RC, insurance, and other documents. The court released the vehicle with conditions including maintaining original specifications, providing updated insurance proof, and producing photographs with panchnama before the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 35/2026 Summary The court approved petitioner Ajay S/o Madhukar Gurude's application for interim custody of his Tata Tipper vehicle (Registration MH-24-AU-2079) seized in FIR 91/2026 under IPC Sections 303(2), 3(5), and Environment Protection Act Section 15, upon furnishing a bond of ₹30,00,000. The vehicle was allegedly used illegally for minor mineral transportation, but the petitioner proved ownership through RC, insurance, and other documents. The court released the vehicle with conditions including maintaining original specifications, providing updated insurance proof, and producing photographs with panchnama before the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts