Shrikrishna S/o Laxman Maddewad. vs The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur — 34/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA060004602026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
246/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shrikrishna S/o Laxman Maddewad.
Adv. Musne Vijay B
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 34/2026 Petitioner: Shrikrishna S/o Laxman Maddewad Respondent: State of Maharashtra (Ahmedpur Police Station) The court granted the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized Tata LPT truck (Registration: MH-05-AM-3055) under CrPC Section 503, with conditions including a bond of ₹25 lakh. The vehicle was seized in FIR 91/2026 under IPC Sections 303(2), 3(5), and Environment Protection Act 1986. The court found the petitioner to be the legitimate owner and ruled that withholding the vehicle during investigation would cause deterioration, while noting the vehicle's seizure would not compromise the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 34/2026 Petitioner: Shrikrishna S/o Laxman Maddewad Respondent: State of Maharashtra (Ahmedpur Police Station) The court granted the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized Tata LPT truck (Registration: MH-05-AM-3055) under CrPC Section 503, with conditions including a bond of ₹25 lakh. The vehicle was seized in FIR 91/2026 under IPC Sections 303(2), 3(5), and Environment Protection Act 1986. The court found the petitioner to be the legitimate owner and ruled that withholding the vehicle during investigation would cause deterioration, while noting the vehicle's seizure would not compromise the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts