Tulshiram S/o Bhimrao Surnar. vs The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur — 33/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA060004592026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
245/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tulshiram S/o Bhimrao Surnar.
Adv. Musne Vijay B
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 07-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted petitioner Tulshiram S/o Bhimrao Surnar's petition for interim custody of a Tata Tipper vehicle (Reg. No. MH-46 AR-6429) seized by Ahmednpur Police in case FIR 91/2026 under IPC sections 303(2), 3(5) and Environment Protection Act section 15. The court released the vehicle on a bond of Rs. 30,00,000 with conditions that the vehicle's original specifications, color, and registration cannot be altered, and the petitioner must maintain comprehensive insurance coverage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted petitioner Tulshiram S/o Bhimrao Surnar's petition for interim custody of a Tata Tipper vehicle (Reg. No. MH-46 AR-6429) seized by Ahmednpur Police in case FIR 91/2026 under IPC sections 303(2), 3(5) and Environment Protection Act section 15. The court released the vehicle on a bond of Rs. 30,00,000 with conditions that the vehicle's original specifications, color, and registration cannot be altered, and the petitioner must maintain comprehensive insurance coverage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts