Pandurang S/o Shesherao Shelgawe. vs The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur — 30/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA060004562026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
242/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
30/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang S/o Shesherao Shelgawe.
Adv. Musne Vijay B
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P I police station Ahmedpur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 30/2026 The court granted Pandurang S/o Shesherao Shelgawe's petition for interim custody of a seized vehicle (MH-26-CH-8498) registered in his name, which was confiscated in a criminal case under IPC sections 303(2), 3(5), and the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The court imposed conditions including a bond of ₹25,00,000, prohibition on altering the vehicle's appearance or transferring it, documentation via photographs and panchnama, and mandatory production before the court if required, finding no risk of misuse given the petitioner's proof of ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 30/2026 The court granted Pandurang S/o Shesherao Shelgawe's petition for interim custody of a seized vehicle (MH-26-CH-8498) registered in his name, which was confiscated in a criminal case under IPC sections 303(2), 3(5), and the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The court imposed conditions including a bond of ₹25,00,000, prohibition on altering the vehicle's appearance or transferring it, documentation via photographs and panchnama, and mandatory production before the court if required, finding no risk of misuse given the petitioner's proof of ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts