Dipak S/o Ram Paratwagh. vs Babasaheb S/o Ram Paratwagh And other 3. — 78/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA060004142026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
195/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
78/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dipak S/o Ram Paratwagh.
Adv. Gaikwad Rajratan V_LAPA58
Respondent(s)
Babasaheb S/o Ram Paratwagh And other 3.
Asha W/o Tanaji Kamble.
Usha W/o Shivaji Kamble.
Manisha W/o Laxman Bhalerao.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD And JMFC Ahmedpur
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 02-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 78/2026 The Lok Adalat at Ahmedpur resolved a dispute between Dipak S/o Ram Paratwagh (petitioner) and Babasaheb S/o Ram Paratwagh and three others, along with Asha W/o Tanaji Kamble and Usha W/o Shivaji Kamble (respondents) through a settlement compromise on 14/03/2026. The parties reached an agreed settlement regarding property matters involving land parcels in Ahmedpur district, with specific conditions regarding ownership, possession, and boundary demarcation. The court approved the settlement and directed refund of court fees paid by either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 78/2026 The Lok Adalat at Ahmedpur resolved a dispute between Dipak S/o Ram Paratwagh (petitioner) and Babasaheb S/o Ram Paratwagh and three others, along with Asha W/o Tanaji Kamble and Usha W/o Shivaji Kamble (respondents) through a settlement compromise on 14/03/2026. The parties reached an agreed settlement regarding property matters involving land parcels in Ahmedpur district, with specific conditions regarding ownership, possession, and boundary demarcation. The court approved the settlement and directed refund of court fees paid by either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts