Mohammad Mustafa S/o Mohammad Harun Lakhani. vs Sana Bano D/o Mohammad Rafiq Musani. — 62/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 07th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA060003332026
e-Filing Number
14-02-2026
Filing Number
157/2026
Filing Date
14-Feb-2026
Registration No
62/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohammad Mustafa S/o Mohammad Harun Lakhani.
Adv. SIDDIQUI ENAYAT ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sana Bano D/o Mohammad Rafiq Musani.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 62 of 2026 The court disposed of Mohammad Mustafa's suit for marriage dissolution against Sana Bano as unconditionally withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the CPC, 1908. The plaintiff appeared with counsel and filed an unconditional withdrawal petition, stating he no longer wished to proceed with the case. The court granted the withdrawal, ordered both parties to bear their own costs, and directed issuance of a court fees refund certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
20-Mar-2026
Written Statement
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
20-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC Ahmedpur
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2026
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 62 of 2026 The court disposed of Mohammad Mustafa's suit for marriage dissolution against Sana Bano as unconditionally withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the CPC, 1908. The plaintiff appeared with counsel and filed an unconditional withdrawal petition, stating he no longer wished to proceed with the case. The court granted the withdrawal, ordered both parties to bear their own costs, and directed issuance of a court fees refund certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts