Sidhaji S/o Gangaram Mekle vs Pundlikrao S/o Subhanrao Mekle Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L — 83/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA060002582018
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
146/2018
Filing Date
16-02-2018
Registration No
83/2018
Registration Date
16-02-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sidhaji S/o Gangaram Mekle
Adv. Demgunde Nathrao N
Respondent(s)
Pundlikrao S/o Subhanrao Mekle Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L
Shashikant S/o Pundlikrao Mekle
Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Defence Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Amended W.S. |
| 04-04-2026 | Amended W.S. |
Interim Orders
Case 83/2018 Summary: In Civil Suit 83/2018 (Sidhaji v. Pundlikrao & Anr.), the defendants filed an application under Order XIII Rule 1 CPC seeking permission to produce documents at a belated stage. The plaintiff opposed, claiming prejudice. The court allowed the application on 19 July 2023, permitting defendants to produce a copy of Writ Petition No. 7394 of 2022 (downloaded from court website), finding the document authentic and necessary to serve ends of justice without prejudicing the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 83/2018 Summary: In Civil Suit 83/2018 (Sidhaji v. Pundlikrao & Anr.), the defendants filed an application under Order XIII Rule 1 CPC seeking permission to produce documents at a belated stage. The plaintiff opposed, claiming prejudice. The court allowed the application on 19 July 2023, permitting defendants to produce a copy of Writ Petition No. 7394 of 2022 (downloaded from court website), finding the document authentic and necessary to serve ends of justice without prejudicing the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts