Yojana W/o Gaurishankar Lavarale. vs The State of Maharashtra Thruogh P I police station Ahmedpur — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA060001142026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
52/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
Ahmdepur Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yojana W/o Gaurishankar Lavarale.
Adv. Kamble Rahul D
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Thruogh P I police station Ahmedpur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Ahmedpur
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 27-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Yojana vs. State (Cri.M.A. No. 08/2026) The court allowed Yojana's application to unhold ₹50,000 that was frozen in a Ratnakar Bank account after she was defrauded through cyber crime. The court found the amount was rightfully hers, having been fraudulently transferred from her Bank of Maharashtra account on 08.12.2025, and directed the bank to release it upon her execution of an indemnity bond with undertaking to refund 1.5 times the amount if her claim proves false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Yojana vs. State (Cri.M.A. No. 08/2026) The court allowed Yojana's application to unhold ₹50,000 that was frozen in a Ratnakar Bank account after she was defrauded through cyber crime. The court found the amount was rightfully hers, having been fraudulently transferred from her Bank of Maharashtra account on 08.12.2025, and directed the bank to release it upon her execution of an indemnity bond with undertaking to refund 1.5 times the amount if her claim proves false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts