Khushal S/o Sitaram Mundhe and other 10 vs Bhagwat S/o Limbaji Latpate and other — 16/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26order7rule1. Status: Report. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHLA050028632025
e-Filing Number
15-09-2025
Filing Number
1657/2025
Filing Date
18-Sep-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Khushal S/o Sitaram Mundhe and other 10
Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L
-
2.Narsing S/o Pandhari Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
3.Vrushraj S/o Vishwnath Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
4.Vaijnath S/o Vishwnath Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
5.Laxman S/o Nivrutti Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
6.Manohar S/o Nivrutti Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
7.Udhav S/o Shankar Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
8.Namdev S/o Shankar Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
9.Tukaram S/o Shankar Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
10.Dnyanoba S/o Sopan Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
-
11.Ramrao S/o Sopan Mundhe
Adv. GHOGRE DHANRAJ LAXMANRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhagwat S/o Limbaji Latpate and other
-
2.Bhanudas S/o Limbaji Latpate
-
3.Prakash S/o Limbaji Latpate
-
4.Jagnath S/o Limbaji Latpate
-
5.Kishor S/o Gangaramji Mundhe
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
30-Apr-2026
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
01-Apr-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: Khushal v. Bhagwat (Case 16/2025) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with interim relief granted. The court granted the petitioners' (Khushal and 10 others) petition regarding disputed land possession. The petitioners, who had long-standing physical possession of agricultural land (4 hectares 10 acres across two survey plots), challenged a sale deed executed by respondent Bhanudas in favor of respondent Prakash. The court found the petitioners held legitimate possession for years and that the sale deed lacked proper evidence of possession transfer. The court issued an interim order restraining the respondent from interfering with the petitioners' possession until final judgment, while reserving costs for final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
30-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
16-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
04-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
17-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
16-Feb-2026
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
04-Feb-2026
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
29-Jan-2026
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
16-Jan-2026
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
15-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
23-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
12-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
12-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
28-Oct-2025
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
17-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Oct-2025
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
14-Oct-2025
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
20-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2025
Case Summary: Khushal v. Bhagwat (Case 16/2025) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with interim relief granted. The court granted the petitioners' (Khushal and 10 others) petition regarding disputed land possession. The petitioners, who had long-standing physical possession of agricultural land (4 hectares 10 acres across two survey plots), challenged a sale deed executed by respondent Bhanudas in favor of respondent Prakash. The court found the petitioners held legitimate possession for years and that the sale deed lacked proper evidence of possession transfer. The court issued an interim order restraining the respondent from interfering with the petitioners' possession until final judgment, while reserving costs for final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts