Ayodhya Vilas Chamle vs Manohar Nivrutti Bembde — 1400757/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050023052025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
1122/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2021
Registration No
1400757/2021
Registration Date
22-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ayodhya Vilas Chamle
Respondent(s)
Manohar Nivrutti Bembde
Sumanbai Manohar Bembade
Dattatrya Manohar Bembde
Hanumant Manohar Bembde
Usha Manohar Bembde @ Usha Tukaram Madde
Suryakant Nivrutti Bembde
Ujwala Suryakant Bembde
Shivaji alias Shivraj Nivrutti Bembde
Balaji Shivaji @ Shivraj Bembde
Kushawarta Shivaji @ Shivraj Bembde
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Evidence
Evidence
List of Witness
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | List of Witness |
| 16-01-2026 | Issues |
| 08-12-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ayodhya Vilas Chamle v. Manohar Nivrutti Bembde (R.C.S. 757/2021) The plaintiff's application to set-aside the interim injunction order (dated 24-07-2024) was rejected. The court found the plaintiff demonstrated negligence and lack of due diligence, noting the suit was filed in December 2021 but no steps were taken on the interim application until July 2024. The plaintiff's excuses—distance from Aurangabad and her advocate's alleged ligament injury—were deemed insufficient without medical proof or supporting documentation. The plaintiff was directed to proceed with the suit expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ayodhya Vilas Chamle v. Manohar Nivrutti Bembde (R.C.S. 757/2021) The plaintiff's application to set-aside the interim injunction order (dated 24-07-2024) was rejected. The court found the plaintiff demonstrated negligence and lack of due diligence, noting the suit was filed in December 2021 but no steps were taken on the interim application until July 2024. The plaintiff's excuses—distance from Aurangabad and her advocate's alleged ligament injury—were deemed insufficient without medical proof or supporting documentation. The plaintiff was directed to proceed with the suit expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts