Sakhubai Wo Madhav Waghmare vs Baghwan So Baban Parthwagh and other 13( — 85/2015
Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050019602025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
788/2025
Filing Date
20-02-2015
Registration No
85/2015
Registration Date
20-02-2015
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Petitioner(s)
Sakhubai Wo Madhav Waghmare
Respondent(s)
Baghwan So Baban Parthwagh and other 13(
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 20-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 85/2015 Case: Civil Suit 85/2015 (Ahmednagar District Court) Petitioner: Sakhubai v. Baghwan (and others) Order Date: 14/02/2026 Outcome: The petitioner's application for partition was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request to partition property (Sector 88, Plot 441) and obtain separate possession of her 1/3 share. The court ruled that the 1919 sale deed is not binding on the petitioner's share, and the fact that 74 acres were acquired by the government under a water project does not hinder the partition proceedings. The court found no impediment to deciding the case on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 85/2015 Case: Civil Suit 85/2015 (Ahmednagar District Court) Petitioner: Sakhubai v. Baghwan (and others) Order Date: 14/02/2026 Outcome: The petitioner's application for partition was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request to partition property (Sector 88, Plot 441) and obtain separate possession of her 1/3 share. The court ruled that the 1919 sale deed is not binding on the petitioner's share, and the fact that 74 acres were acquired by the government under a water project does not hinder the partition proceedings. The court found no impediment to deciding the case on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts