State of Maharashtra vs Umesh So Baban Kundale Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L — 1500079/2012
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 17720534. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA050018462025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
1128/2025
Filing Date
01-06-2012
Registration No
1500079/2012
Registration Date
01-06-2012
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Umesh So Baban Kundale Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L
Janardhan @ Baban So Venkat Nilewad
Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L
Shalubai Wo Madhav Gojewad
Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 21-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State vs. Umesh (R.C.C. No. 79/2012) The accused Umesh applied to alter charges from IPC sections 177 and 205 to sections 182 and 187. The court rejected the application, holding that the allegations—that Umesh impersonated another accused (Ganesh) in judicial proceedings and gave false information to the court—squarely attracted sections 177 (furnishing false information) and 205 (false impersonation in judicial proceedings). Sections 182 and 187 were found factually and contextually inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State vs. Umesh (R.C.C. No. 79/2012) The accused Umesh applied to alter charges from IPC sections 177 and 205 to sections 182 and 187. The court rejected the application, holding that the allegations—that Umesh impersonated another accused (Ganesh) in judicial proceedings and gave false information to the court—squarely attracted sections 177 (furnishing false information) and 205 (false impersonation in judicial proceedings). Sections 182 and 187 were found factually and contextually inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts