State of Maharashtra vs Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme and other — 33/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 81,115,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA050017382025

Filing Number

1020/2025

Filing Date

05-Feb-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

05-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 81,115,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Kakde Ashwini N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme and other

  2. 2.Mira Govind Chilme

  3. 3.Govind S/o Dnyaoba Chilme

  4. 4.Megha Sopan Yenge

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Shrinivas, Mira, and Govind Chilme) of charges under IPC sections 85, 115, 352, 351(2), and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove extortion, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony alleging that the accused conspired to extort ₹5 lakhs through threats and physical abuse over several months, the prosecution presented insufficient corroborating evidence. The two prosecution witnesses contradicted the extortion narrative in cross-examination, and no independent documentary or investigative evidence substantiated the serious allegations, rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  14. 07-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  15. 03-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 05-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Shrinivas, Mira, and Govind Chilme) of charges under IPC sections 85, 115, 352, 351(2), and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove extortion, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony alleging that the accused conspired to extort ₹5 lakhs through threats and physical abuse over several months, the prosecution presented insufficient corroborating evidence. The two prosecution witnesses contradicted the extortion narrative in cross-examination, and no independent documentary or investigative evidence substantiated the serious allegations, rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case