State of Maharashtra vs Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme and other — 33/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 81,115,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA050017382025
Filing Number
1020/2025
Filing Date
05-02-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
05-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Kakde Ashwini N
Respondent(s)
Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme and other
Mira Govind Chilme
Govind S/o Dnyaoba Chilme
Megha Sopan Yenge
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 06-01-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Shrinivas, Mira, and Govind Chilme) of charges under IPC sections 85, 115, 352, 351(2), and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove extortion, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony alleging that the accused conspired to extort ₹5 lakhs through threats and physical abuse over several months, the prosecution presented insufficient corroborating evidence. The two prosecution witnesses contradicted the extortion narrative in cross-examination, and no independent documentary or investigative evidence substantiated the serious allegations, rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Shrinivas, Mira, and Govind Chilme) of charges under IPC sections 85, 115, 352, 351(2), and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove extortion, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony alleging that the accused conspired to extort ₹5 lakhs through threats and physical abuse over several months, the prosecution presented insufficient corroborating evidence. The two prosecution witnesses contradicted the extortion narrative in cross-examination, and no independent documentary or investigative evidence substantiated the serious allegations, rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts