State of Maharashtra vs Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme and other — 33/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 81,115,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA050017382025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1020/2025

Filing Date

05-02-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

05-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 81,115,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Kakde Ashwini N

Respondent(s)

Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme and other

Mira Govind Chilme

Govind S/o Dnyaoba Chilme

Megha Sopan Yenge

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

04-05-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Arguments

13-03-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Appearance

06-01-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Shrinivas, Mira, and Govind Chilme) of charges under IPC sections 85, 115, 352, 351(2), and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove extortion, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony alleging that the accused conspired to extort ₹5 lakhs through threats and physical abuse over several months, the prosecution presented insufficient corroborating evidence. The two prosecution witnesses contradicted the extortion narrative in cross-examination, and no independent documentary or investigative evidence substantiated the serious allegations, rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

16-04-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrinivas S/o Govind Chilme Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Shrinivas, Mira, and Govind Chilme) of charges under IPC sections 85, 115, 352, 351(2), and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove extortion, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony alleging that the accused conspired to extort ₹5 lakhs through threats and physical abuse over several months, the prosecution presented insufficient corroborating evidence. The two prosecution witnesses contradicted the extortion narrative in cross-examination, and no independent documentary or investigative evidence substantiated the serious allegations, rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case