State of Maharashtra vs Anil @ Annarao So Mhadhavrao Brajdar Takalikar and other — 1500053/2011

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 32432350450634. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA050014792025

Evidence

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

761/2025

Filing Date

29-04-2011

Registration No

1500053/2011

Registration Date

29-04-2011

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 32432350450634

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Kakde Ashwini N

Respondent(s)

Anil @ Annarao So Mhadhavrao Brajdar Takalikar and other

Ramdas So Tukaram yagade

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

12-05-2026

Evidence

10-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-01-2026
Evidence

In case 1500053/2011 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ahamadpur, the court examined prosecution witnesses under CrPC Section 299. The witnesses testified regarding a 2011 incident between the complainant Govind Vitthal Waghamare and the accused. During cross-examination, the court permitted leading questions and observed that witnesses appeared to be giving false testimony to protect the accused. Examination of both witnesses was completed, and the court found the examination complete under CrPC Section 299; no final verdict on the case is stated in this order, as it appears to be an interlocutory order on witness examination (dated 03/01/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In case 1500053/2011 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ahamadpur, the court examined prosecution witnesses under CrPC Section 299. The witnesses testified regarding a 2011 incident between the complainant Govind Vitthal Waghamare and the accused. During cross-examination, the court permitted leading questions and observed that witnesses appeared to be giving false testimony to protect the accused. Examination of both witnesses was completed, and the court found the examination complete under CrPC Section 299; no final verdict on the case is stated in this order, as it appears to be an interlocutory order on witness examination (dated 03/01/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case