State of Maharashtra vs Anil @ Annarao So Mhadhavrao Brajdar Takalikar and other — 1500053/2011
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 32432350450634. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA050014792025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
761/2025
Filing Date
29-04-2011
Registration No
1500053/2011
Registration Date
29-04-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Kakde Ashwini N
Respondent(s)
Anil @ Annarao So Mhadhavrao Brajdar Takalikar and other
Ramdas So Tukaram yagade
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
In case 1500053/2011 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ahamadpur, the court examined prosecution witnesses under CrPC Section 299. The witnesses testified regarding a 2011 incident between the complainant Govind Vitthal Waghamare and the accused. During cross-examination, the court permitted leading questions and observed that witnesses appeared to be giving false testimony to protect the accused. Examination of both witnesses was completed, and the court found the examination complete under CrPC Section 299; no final verdict on the case is stated in this order, as it appears to be an interlocutory order on witness examination (dated 03/01/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In case 1500053/2011 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ahamadpur, the court examined prosecution witnesses under CrPC Section 299. The witnesses testified regarding a 2011 incident between the complainant Govind Vitthal Waghamare and the accused. During cross-examination, the court permitted leading questions and observed that witnesses appeared to be giving false testimony to protect the accused. Examination of both witnesses was completed, and the court found the examination complete under CrPC Section 299; no final verdict on the case is stated in this order, as it appears to be an interlocutory order on witness examination (dated 03/01/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts