State of Maharashtra vs Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and oths — 386/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324, 323, 504, 506, 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA050011902025

Evidence

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

481/2025

Filing Date

30-08-2022

Registration No

386/2022

Registration Date

30-08-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324, 323, 504, 506, 34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Kakde Ashwini N

Respondent(s)

Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and oths

Sayas Annarao Phad

Anjanabai Sayas Phad

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

15-05-2026

Evidence

18-04-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

B.W._Ready

21-02-2026

B.W._Ready

27-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

18-04-2026
Evidence

Case Summary: 386/2022 This is a criminal case filed by the State of Maharashtra against Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and others (Sayas Annarao Phad and Anjanabai Sayas Phad). The complainant alleged that on 23/02/2021, he was assaulted with an axe and knife by the accused following a dispute over a grocery shop debt. The court examined the complainant's testimony, recording his account of the attack and injuries sustained. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the complainant's credibility on multiple points, questioning details about shop timings, lockdown conditions, and the alleged weapons used. The court accepted the cross-examination responses. Cross-examination completed; case proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 386/2022 This is a criminal case filed by the State of Maharashtra against Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and others (Sayas Annarao Phad and Anjanabai Sayas Phad). The complainant alleged that on 23/02/2021, he was assaulted with an axe and knife by the accused following a dispute over a grocery shop debt. The court examined the complainant's testimony, recording his account of the attack and injuries sustained. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the complainant's credibility on multiple points, questioning details about shop timings, lockdown conditions, and the alleged weapons used. The court accepted the cross-examination responses. Cross-examination completed; case proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case