State of Maharashtra vs Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and oths — 386/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324, 323, 504, 506, 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA050011902025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
481/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2022
Registration No
386/2022
Registration Date
30-08-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Kakde Ashwini N
Respondent(s)
Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and oths
Sayas Annarao Phad
Anjanabai Sayas Phad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Evidence
Evidence
B.W._Ready
B.W._Ready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | B.W._Ready |
| 21-02-2026 | B.W._Ready |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 386/2022 This is a criminal case filed by the State of Maharashtra against Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and others (Sayas Annarao Phad and Anjanabai Sayas Phad). The complainant alleged that on 23/02/2021, he was assaulted with an axe and knife by the accused following a dispute over a grocery shop debt. The court examined the complainant's testimony, recording his account of the attack and injuries sustained. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the complainant's credibility on multiple points, questioning details about shop timings, lockdown conditions, and the alleged weapons used. The court accepted the cross-examination responses. Cross-examination completed; case proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 386/2022 This is a criminal case filed by the State of Maharashtra against Kishor @ Krishna Sayas Phad and others (Sayas Annarao Phad and Anjanabai Sayas Phad). The complainant alleged that on 23/02/2021, he was assaulted with an axe and knife by the accused following a dispute over a grocery shop debt. The court examined the complainant's testimony, recording his account of the attack and injuries sustained. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the complainant's credibility on multiple points, questioning details about shop timings, lockdown conditions, and the alleged weapons used. The court accepted the cross-examination responses. Cross-examination completed; case proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts