State of Maharashtra vs Vasant Ganpati Ghogre and other 2 Advocate - Patil Hemantkumar R — 160/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,327,341,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA050011832025

Filing Number

474/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2018

Registration No

160/2018

Registration Date

12-Nov-2018

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 326,327,341,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Kakde Ashwini N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasant Ganpati Ghogre and other 2 Advocate - Patil Hemantkumar R

  2. 2.Vikas Vasant Ghogre

  3. 3.Rahul Vasant Ghogre

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary Case 160/2018 - State of Maharashtra v. Vasant Ganpati Ghogre & Others The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Vasant Ganpati Ghogre, Vikas Vasant Ghogre, and Rahul Vasant Ghogre) of charges under IPC Sections 326, 327, 341, 323, and 506 with Section 34, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that while eyewitness accounts existed, critical evidence—particularly the iron rod allegedly used to cause injury—was never recovered, creating substantial doubt about the charges of grievous hurt and criminal intimidation. The judgment emphasized insufficient corroboration between witness testimonies and the complaint filed two days after the alleged incident on August 13, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  4. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  15. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  16. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  17. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  18. 18-Oct-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  19. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  20. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  22. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  23. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  24. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  25. 03-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  26. 25-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 12-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case 160/2018 - State of Maharashtra v. Vasant Ganpati Ghogre & Others The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Vasant Ganpati Ghogre, Vikas Vasant Ghogre, and Rahul Vasant Ghogre) of charges under IPC Sections 326, 327, 341, 323, and 506 with Section 34, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that while eyewitness accounts existed, critical evidence—particularly the iron rod allegedly used to cause injury—was never recovered, creating substantial doubt about the charges of grievous hurt and criminal intimidation. The judgment emphasized insufficient corroboration between witness testimonies and the complaint filed two days after the alleged incident on August 13, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case