Jaitunbee W/o Noormohammad Shaikh and other vs Mehtab Rasoolsab and other — 10/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 11th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHLA050009172025
Filing Number
689/2025
Filing Date
19-09-2016
Registration No
10/2016
Registration Date
19-09-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jaitunbee W/o Noormohammad Shaikh and other
Aktarbee W/o Rajjak Shaikh
Respondent(s)
Mehtab Rasoolsab and other
Dastgir Walisab
Osman Ahmedsab kinniwale Died(Legal Heir) 3.
Shahedabi W/o Osman Kiniwale 3.
Chand S/o Osman Kiniwale 3.
Yasmin W/o Rahim Pathan
Shadul Ahmedsab Kinniwale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Disposed
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 02-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-02-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by Jaitunbee against Mehtab Rasoolsab for want of prosecution. Despite repeated opportunities and a lifting of the stay on the decree in November 2025, the decree holder failed to take necessary steps or submit required documents for executing the modified decree. The court held that decree holders must diligently pursue execution proceedings, and indefinite pendency without action warrants dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by Jaitunbee against Mehtab Rasoolsab for want of prosecution. Despite repeated opportunities and a lifting of the stay on the decree in November 2025, the decree holder failed to take necessary steps or submit required documents for executing the modified decree. The court held that decree holders must diligently pursue execution proceedings, and indefinite pendency without action warrants dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts