Uttam S/o Govind Chavan vs Ganapati S/o Govind Chavan — 951/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7Rule 1 & 2. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA050008692025

Amended Plaint

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-12-2024

Filing Number

641/2025

Filing Date

06-12-2024

Registration No

951/2024

Registration Date

06-12-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order 7Rule 1 & 2

Petitioner(s)

Uttam S/o Govind Chavan

Respondent(s)

Ganapati S/o Govind Chavan

Hanamant S/o Rupla Chavan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

08-06-2026

Amended Plaint

22-04-2026

Amended Plaint

30-03-2026

Compliance

16-03-2026

Compliance

16-02-2026

Compliance

Interim Orders

06-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Civil Case 951/2024 (Uttam v. Ganapati and Hanamant), the court granted the petitioner's application for correction/rectification of the plaint filed under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The petitioner sought to correct typographical errors in the property descriptions within the plaint, including corrections to plot numbers, land area measurements (changing "2 acres 4 ares" to "83 ares"), and location names (such as "Mouje Varavati" to "Mouje Shingi"). The court found these corrections necessary and would not prejudice the defendants' rights, so the petition was allowed and the petitioner was directed to file the corrected plaint in the original suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case 951/2024 (Uttam v. Ganapati and Hanamant), the court granted the petitioner's application for correction/rectification of the plaint filed under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The petitioner sought to correct typographical errors in the property descriptions within the plaint, including corrections to plot numbers, land area measurements (changing "2 acres 4 ares" to "83 ares"), and location names (such as "Mouje Varavati" to "Mouje Shingi"). The court found these corrections necessary and would not prejudice the defendants' rights, so the petition was allowed and the petitioner was directed to file the corrected plaint in the original suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case