Ramesh S/o Vinayak Kadam vs Kamalbai W/o Ramesh Kadam — 240/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050008042025
e-Filing Number
28-02-2024
Filing Number
576/2025
Filing Date
01-Mar-2024
Registration No
240/2024
Registration Date
02-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramesh S/o Vinayak Kadam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kamalbai W/o Ramesh Kadam
-
2.Umesh S/o Ramesh Kadam
-
3.Sulekha W/o Umesh Kadam
-
4.Mahesh So Ramesh Kadam
-
5.Sonali W/o Mahesh Kadam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The suit filed by Ramesh against Kamalbai and others was dismissed under Order IX Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide copies of the plaint and necessary documents required for service of summons upon the defendants, despite being given sufficient opportunity to do so, which prevented the issuance and service of summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
16-Mar-2026
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
24-Dec-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
04-Nov-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
08-Sep-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
10-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 240/2024
The suit filed by Ramesh against Kamalbai and others was dismissed under Order IX Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide copies of the plaint and necessary documents required for service of summons upon the defendants, despite being given sufficient opportunity to do so, which prevented the issuance and service of summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts