Annapurna alies Girija w/o Shivaji Pawar vs Kondabai Dattatray alies Datta Hasule and other 2 Advocate - Patil Hemantkumar R — 719/2022
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 1. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA050006672022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1093/2022
Filing Date
30-11-2022
Registration No
719/2022
Registration Date
30-11-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annapurna alies Girija w/o Shivaji Pawar
Adv. Shelke Vijaykumar S
Respondent(s)
Kondabai Dattatray alies Datta Hasule and other 2 Advocate - Patil Hemantkumar R
Madhav Dattatray @ Datta Hasule
Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R
Keshav Dattatray @ Datta Hasule
Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 23-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 719/2022 SKIP The court order is presented primarily in Marathi script but is largely illegible and severely garbled. While some isolated Marathi words and phrases are discernible, the text lacks coherent structure, contains numerous corruption artifacts, and does not present a clear, readable legal judgment. The document does not allow for accurate identification of the specific relief granted (petition allowed/dismissed, bail decision, etc.) or a proper summary of the case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 719/2022 SKIP The court order is presented primarily in Marathi script but is largely illegible and severely garbled. While some isolated Marathi words and phrases are discernible, the text lacks coherent structure, contains numerous corruption artifacts, and does not present a clear, readable legal judgment. The document does not allow for accurate identification of the specific relief granted (petition allowed/dismissed, bail decision, etc.) or a proper summary of the case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts