Raosaheb S/o Govindrao Sanap vs The Member of Secretary and other 2 Advocate - Zample Anurdha S — 31/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHLA050006222019
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
509/2019
Filing Date
06-12-2019
Registration No
31/2019
Registration Date
06-12-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raosaheb S/o Govindrao Sanap
Adv. Mundhe Bhaskar S
Respondent(s)
The Member of Secretary and other 2 Advocate - Zample Anurdha S
The Executive Engineer, Latur
Adv. Zample Anurdha S
The Superintending Engineer, Jeevan Pradhikaran Latur
Adv. Zample Anurdha S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
In Spl.C.S. No.31/2019, the court allowed the defendants' application to amend their written statement under Order VII Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendants sought to add arguments regarding court jurisdiction, limitation, and the State of Maharashtra as a necessary party—facts omitted due to lack of documents during initial pleading. The court found amendment necessary and permissible, applying the liberal standard for written statement amendments. The application was allowed with costs of Rs.500 each payable by defendants to plaintiff, and defendants were directed to submit the amended written statement on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Spl.C.S. No.31/2019, the court allowed the defendants' application to amend their written statement under Order VII Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendants sought to add arguments regarding court jurisdiction, limitation, and the State of Maharashtra as a necessary party—facts omitted due to lack of documents during initial pleading. The court found amendment necessary and permissible, applying the liberal standard for written statement amendments. The application was allowed with costs of Rs.500 each payable by defendants to plaintiff, and defendants were directed to submit the amended written statement on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts