Riyajoddhin S/o Afajaloddhin Jahagirdar (Kazi)and other 4 vs Harnyabai W/o Dnyanoba More and other 1 Advocate - Patil Hemantkumar R — 615/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 04-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA050005972025

Filing Number

369/2025

Filing Date

15-Jun-2022

Registration No

615/2022

Registration Date

15-Jun-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Riyajoddhin S/o Afajaloddhin Jahagirdar (Kazi)and other 4

    Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L

  2. 2.Liyakhatmunisa W/o Afjaloddhin Jahagirdar (kazi)

  3. 3.Salauddhin S/o Afajaloddhin Jahagirdar (kazi)

  4. 4.jakiyoddhin S/o Afjaloddhin Jahagirdar (Kazi

  5. 5.Samiyoddhin S/o Afjaloddin Jahagirdar (Kazi)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harnyabai W/o Dnyanoba More and other 1 Advocate - Patil Hemantkumar R

  2. 2.Dnyanoba S/o Sudam More

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case 615/2022 Summary Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners filed a frivolous suit against the respondents regarding a disputed loan transaction from 1991. The court determined through cross-examination that the petitioners could not substantiate their claims of unpaid debt or provide receipts for alleged interest payments. The deed (Sale Deed No. 2399/1991) was found to be valid and binding. The civil judge concluded that the petition was filed without legitimate cause and dismissed it with costs awarded against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  13. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  14. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  15. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 15-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 615/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 615/2022 Summary Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners filed a frivolous suit against the respondents regarding a disputed loan transaction from 1991. The court determined through cross-examination that the petitioners could not substantiate their claims of unpaid debt or provide receipts for alleged interest payments. The deed (Sale Deed No. 2399/1991) was found to be valid and binding. The civil judge concluded that the petition was filed without legitimate cause and dismissed it with costs awarded against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case