Iftekhar alies Juber S/o Mohammad Isaq Shaikh vs Sarojini W/o Vishwajeet Joshi Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L — 26/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7Rule1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHLA050004892024

Issues

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

24-11-2024

Filing Number

462/2024

Filing Date

27-11-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

27-11-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section order7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Iftekhar alies Juber S/o Mohammad Isaq Shaikh

Adv. Murkute Satyavan B

Respondent(s)

Sarojini W/o Vishwajeet Joshi Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

02-05-2026

Issues

02-04-2026

Issues

27-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

02-04-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Iftekhar v. Sarojini (Case 26/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted temporary injunction restraining the respondent from transferring the remaining property (plot no. 506) to a third party until final judgment in the underlying civil case. The petitioner's application costs are to be incorporated in the final decree. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed the respondent agreed to sell 3 hectares of agricultural land for Rs. 11,25,000 per acre and already transferred portions to petitioner's sons via sale deeds. Respondent denied the agreement, claiming no consideration was received and no binding contract existed. The court found petitioner had established prima facie rights and balance of convenience favored him, as respondent's transfer to another buyer would cause irreparable harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Iftekhar v. Sarojini (Case 26/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted temporary injunction restraining the respondent from transferring the remaining property (plot no. 506) to a third party until final judgment in the underlying civil case. The petitioner's application costs are to be incorporated in the final decree. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed the respondent agreed to sell 3 hectares of agricultural land for Rs. 11,25,000 per acre and already transferred portions to petitioner's sons via sale deeds. Respondent denied the agreement, claiming no consideration was received and no binding contract existed. The court found petitioner had established prima facie rights and balance of convenience favored him, as respondent's transfer to another buyer would cause irreparable harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case