Iftekhar alies Juber S/o Mohammad Isaq Shaikh vs Sarojini W/o Vishwajeet Joshi Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L — 26/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7Rule1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHLA050004892024
e-Filing Number
24-11-2024
Filing Number
462/2024
Filing Date
27-Nov-2024
Registration No
26/2024
Registration Date
27-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Iftekhar alies Juber S/o Mohammad Isaq Shaikh
Adv. Murkute Satyavan B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarojini W/o Vishwajeet Joshi Advocate - Ghogre Dhanraj L
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: Iftekhar v. Sarojini (Case 26/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted temporary injunction restraining the respondent from transferring the remaining property (plot no. 506) to a third party until final judgment in the underlying civil case. The petitioner's application costs are to be incorporated in the final decree. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed the respondent agreed to sell 3 hectares of agricultural land for Rs. 11,25,000 per acre and already transferred portions to petitioner's sons via sale deeds. Respondent denied the agreement, claiming no consideration was received and no binding contract existed. The court found petitioner had established prima facie rights and balance of convenience favored him, as respondent's transfer to another buyer would cause irreparable harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
27-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
17-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
26-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
23-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
20-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
12-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
03-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
02-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
14-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
29-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
26-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
03-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
07-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
10-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
27-Jun-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
11-Jun-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
30-Apr-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
05-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
06-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
15-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
10-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
20-Dec-2024
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
-
28-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2024
Case Summary: Iftekhar v. Sarojini (Case 26/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted temporary injunction restraining the respondent from transferring the remaining property (plot no. 506) to a third party until final judgment in the underlying civil case. The petitioner's application costs are to be incorporated in the final decree. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed the respondent agreed to sell 3 hectares of agricultural land for Rs. 11,25,000 per acre and already transferred portions to petitioner's sons via sale deeds. Respondent denied the agreement, claiming no consideration was received and no binding contract existed. The court found petitioner had established prima facie rights and balance of convenience favored him, as respondent's transfer to another buyer would cause irreparable harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts