Hemant s/o Ramchandrarao Patil vs Land Acquisition officer and other — 230/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050003332018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
302/2018
Filing Date
30-06-2018
Registration No
230/2018
Registration Date
30-06-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hemant s/o Ramchandrarao Patil
Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R
Jayant s/o Ramchandrarao Patil
Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R
Respondent(s)
Land Acquisition officer and other
Baburao s/o Madhavrao Jadhav
Sayed Nisar Umersaheb
Sayed Nawaj Khajasab
Sayed Wahid Daudsab
Sayed Hurmatbee Daulasaheb
Sayed Akram Abbas
Sayed Khurram Abbassab
Sayed Dildar Gafoorsab
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Steps |
| 18-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 21-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 230/2018 - Hemant & Jayant Patil v. State of Maharashtra & Others Hemant and Jayant Patil sought to withdraw land acquisition compensation deposited with the court for their acquired property (Sy.No.54, Kalegaon village). The court rejected their execution petition on June 27, 2024, holding that since execution of a related ownership decree (RCS No.21/2013) was stayed and an appeal (RCA No.16/2016) on that decree was pending, releasing the compensation amount would prejudice the other claimants' interests. The court ordered the amount remain in court deposit pending the appeal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 230/2018 - Hemant & Jayant Patil v. State of Maharashtra & Others Hemant and Jayant Patil sought to withdraw land acquisition compensation deposited with the court for their acquired property (Sy.No.54, Kalegaon village). The court rejected their execution petition on June 27, 2024, holding that since execution of a related ownership decree (RCS No.21/2013) was stayed and an appeal (RCA No.16/2016) on that decree was pending, releasing the compensation amount would prejudice the other claimants' interests. The court ordered the amount remain in court deposit pending the appeal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts