Hemant s/o Ramchandrarao Patil and other 1 vs State of Maharashtra and other 2 Advocate - Patil Mahesh K — 229/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050003322018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
301/2018
Filing Date
30-06-2018
Registration No
229/2018
Registration Date
30-06-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hemant s/o Ramchandrarao Patil and other 1
Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R
Jayant s/o Ramchandrarao Patil
Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra and other 2 Advocate - Patil Mahesh K
Executive Enginner,
Baburao Madhavrao Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Steps |
| 18-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 21-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 229/2018 Hemant and Jayant Patil sought to withdraw land acquisition compensation deposited by the court for their acquired property (Sy.No.54, Kalegaon). The court rejected their execution petition, holding that since the related ownership decree (RCS 21/2013) is stayed pending appeal and the outcome of the land reference depends on that appeal decision, releasing the compensation would prejudice the other party's interests if they succeed in appeal. The court retained the amount in fixed deposit pending resolution of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 229/2018 Hemant and Jayant Patil sought to withdraw land acquisition compensation deposited by the court for their acquired property (Sy.No.54, Kalegaon). The court rejected their execution petition, holding that since the related ownership decree (RCS 21/2013) is stayed pending appeal and the outcome of the land reference depends on that appeal decision, releasing the compensation would prejudice the other party's interests if they succeed in appeal. The court retained the amount in fixed deposit pending resolution of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts