Hemant s/o Ramchandrarao patil vs State of Maharashtra and other 8 Advocate - Patil Mahesh K — 228/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050003312018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
300/2018
Filing Date
30-06-2018
Registration No
228/2018
Registration Date
30-06-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hemant s/o Ramchandrarao patil
Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R
Jayant s/o Ramchandrarao Patil
Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra and other 8 Advocate - Patil Mahesh K
Executive Enginner,
Sayyed Nisar Umersaheb
Sayyed Nawaj Khajasab
Sayed Wahid s/o Daudsad
Sayed Hurmatbee w/o Daulasaheb
Sayed s/o Akram Abbas
Sayyad Khurram Abassab
Sayed Dildar Gafoorsab
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Steps |
| 18-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 21-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case 228/2018 Summary: Hemant and Jayant Patil filed an execution petition to withdraw land acquisition compensation deposited in court for their acquired property in Kalegaon village. The court rejected the application on 27/06/2024, finding that since the related RCS No.21/2013 decree's execution was stayed pending appeal (RCA No.16/2016), and the parties' rights remained undetermined, releasing the compensation would prejudice the respondents if their appeal succeeded. The compensation will remain court-invested pending the appeal decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 228/2018 Summary: Hemant and Jayant Patil filed an execution petition to withdraw land acquisition compensation deposited in court for their acquired property in Kalegaon village. The court rejected the application on 27/06/2024, finding that since the related RCS No.21/2013 decree's execution was stayed pending appeal (RCA No.16/2016), and the parties' rights remained undetermined, releasing the compensation would prejudice the respondents if their appeal succeeded. The compensation will remain court-invested pending the appeal decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts