Shivaji s/o Devidas Lohare vs Balaji s/o Jayram Muakurwar and other 2 Advocate - Kamble Satish S — 13/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHLA050002782020
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
217/2020
Filing Date
12-11-2020
Registration No
13/2020
Registration Date
12-11-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji s/o Devidas Lohare
Adv. Phad Sangram B
Respondent(s)
Balaji s/o Jayram Muakurwar and other 2 Advocate - Kamble Satish S
Mahadev alies Madhav S/o Vishwanath Lohare
Adv. Shelke Pankaj V
Ankush S/o Narsoba Birajdar
Adv. Kamble Satish S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 13/2020: Shivaji v. Balaji Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court completed the cross-examination of the petitioner (Shivaji) and found his testimony inconsistent and unreliable. The petitioner's claims regarding land disputes, false criminal cases, and allegations against the respondent (Balaji) were not substantiated. The court rejected the petitioner's assertions and ruled against him, concluding that the petitioner had failed to establish his case. Date of Order: 29 April 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 13/2020: Shivaji v. Balaji Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court completed the cross-examination of the petitioner (Shivaji) and found his testimony inconsistent and unreliable. The petitioner's claims regarding land disputes, false criminal cases, and allegations against the respondent (Balaji) were not substantiated. The court rejected the petitioner's assertions and ruled against him, concluding that the petitioner had failed to establish his case. Date of Order: 29 April 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts